I don’t see this ending well. Non-responsiveness backed by bullying and the dear hope that we peons do not know or understand the laws that they would deign to threaten us with. From the article at Big Government.
After researching 47 U.S.C. 223, I called Mr. Garamendi’s office again and asked to be transferred back to the Capital Police Agent. The Agent picked up the phone and I explained to him that the statute he cited was not controlling since it only prohibits people from calling with the specific intent to harass. I further explained that I was simply trying to voice my concerns with the intent of getting Mr. Garamendi to change his mind, not to harass his staff. The Agent eventually agreed with my position and said he would call Mr. Garamendi’s office and instruct his staff that I was within my rights to call my congressman and voice my concerns.
Well, if these shitheels are going to ignore their positive duties entailed in the constitution why would they ever consider honoring any other part of the charter which they have sworn to uphold and protect.
Silly, antiquted document it’s only the law of the land.
By their actions they have rendered the constitution moot.
They have rendered themselves illegitimate.
I read this earlier BIC and couldn’t believe it. Any Congressman or staff that answers in this manner should be summarily booted immediately to the curb.
I thought about getting a noose as tar and pitchfork too good.
Where do these “public” servants who we are paying for get off thinking they can tell us not to question?
Can I cite that code or something similar when the robo calls start in OCT/NOV begging for my vote?