Whenever possible (and even when not), racism is the answer.
At least that what the Presstitutes and avid supporters of the President (but I repeat myself) have decided to tell us in the wake of the very serious President’s release of his long form birth certificate, before he tackled the very serious issue of flying to Chicago for a taping of Oprah and an arduous day of serious fund-raising.
Before we go further, I have to disclose something. I’ve followed a few of the birth certificate lawsuits with great interest. The Berg case caught my interest and I read the pleadings as they were posted with greater interest. I wanted to know how the court was going to rule, even if I wasn’t sure exactly why the FEC was named in the suit, since as near as I could tell, their purpose is not to vet the candidates bona fides, but is instead to watch the money trail and blow the whistle on campaign finance violations. As time wore on, I tried to figure out why it was that someone who wanted the job, and would require the confidence of the people he sought to lead would work so hard and spend so much money to keep something private if there was no “there” there. The well-heeled counsel from Perkins Coie do not come cheap. And since other “facts” of his past, reported in his own memoirs, appeared to raise questions…niggling little things like trips to Pokeestaan and being adopted by an Indonesian national, and trivialities like that. And as long as his academic record seems to be the new standard for some to rally round, I was somewhat fascinated to find that despite being on law review during his time at Harvard Law School, he apparently never authored a law review article. As a graduate of two law schools myself, I wondered (and STILL wonder) how it is that he accomplished that particular feat.
But as the weeks stretched into years, and the dismissals in the various venues piled up, I found it difficult to care. Unlike some of my friends, I didn’t believe that it was an issue that truly mattered any more. I never believed that this was some sort of conspiracy dating back to his birth wherever that event took place. It didn’t have to be. After we had passed a certain threshold, even if it was proven that he was intelligible, I had no reason to believe that every act and executive order he affixed his signature to would be suddenly null and void, thus freeing us from the disasters he had set loose upon the country. You can’t unring a bell, unscramble eggs, or unspend billions of dollars. This doesn’t mean that my curiosity about spending the money fighting the requests in venue after venue, or his academic career was put to rest. As lawyer, I’d never counsel someone to fight the lawsuits the way that he did, at the cost it ran up when the whole thing could be made to go away with simply presenting the long form to the Court…at least not without a letter to the client stating very plainly “While I love taking your money to do this, you could defeat this and all future claims by just presenting the damn thing, right?” sitting in my file with their signature acknowledging that they received it from me. No, while my curiosity remains, I came to regard this entire episode as one more example of the contempt he has for the American people. And now that the inevitable post-mortems have commenced, the consensus of the hand-wringing concerned members of the press and his adoring supporters have returned to the tired, predictable, and baseless conclusion that just happens to coincide with yet another election in which he plans to participate. Yes, these big brains have once again settled on their favorite conclusion: this was an issue because the people who cared were racists!!!11!!!
Let’s start first with the adoring fans. From my friend Rutherford Lawson, the only sort-of-sane, and occasionally honest lefty I know:
But there is a sad downside to this capitulation. The most powerful man in the world today was reduced to saying essentially, “Yes Massa, I really is an American. I gots the papers to prove it.” Not since the dark days of the 19th century where blacks had to identify themselves as free or slave has a man’s identity been so disgustingly challenged. There is no doubt that our incredibly sheltered citizenry who can’t identify other countries on a map had an adjustment to make with a President with such an exotic background. And let’s be honest. Obama, at least from one side of his family, is a first generation American. That is NEW for our country. However, his background makes him a black American.
Of course the Press, not to be done in its role as the President’s biggest supporter, rushed to make sure that we all knew that the question only existed to begin with because those asking it were racists:
So what’s fueling the dogged questioning of Obama’s origins? Many critics of the birther movement say its core tenets–and its stubborn resistance to evidence disproving those beliefs–can be traced to racial hostilities. The fundamental birtherist conviction, these critics say, is that an African-American can’t have legitimately won the presidency–and that his elevation to power therefore has to be the result of an elaborate subterfuge.
“There is a real deep-seated and vicious racism at work here in terms of trying to de-legitimate the president,” Peniel Joseph, a professor of history at Tufts University, told The Ticket.
“This is more than just a conspiracy,” Peniel added. “I think this is fundamentally connected to white supremacism in this country.”
Of course. And as a white male who has ancestry in this country dating back to well before it was a country, I cannot tell you how put out I am to learn that white supremacism is so incredibly powerful, and yet I was never given an invitation to join this mighty cabal that is so powerful that it could ask questions that were asked of other Presidents in the past, but somehow glossed over by a criminally uncurious press corps in the last Presidential election cycle, and have it considered, even momentarily, as anything other than racism.
And of course, the Press wants us to believe that racism drove this issue because “the experts” have told us that this is so.
Meanwhile, an eye-opening recent study from the University of Delaware appears to confirm that race-minded detractors of Obama view him as “less American”–as Dan Vergano writes for USA Today.
The study, which surveyed blacks and whites on their opinions of Obama compared to Vice President Joe Biden, found that whites classified as “higher prejudice-predicted Whites” viewed Obama as “less American”–a view that, in turn, resulted in lower evaluations of the president’s performance.
“Finally, many in the media have speculated that current criticisms of Obama are a result of his race, rather than his agenda. We believe that the current results are an empirical demonstration that this is sadly the case,” the study concluded in its analysis. “As the United States approaches important decisions regarding issues such as economic reform, health care, and overseas military interventions, the intrusion of racial attitudes in the evaluation of political leaders’ performance is ironically inconsistent with what many believe to be ‘American.’ “
I really can’t think of any other way to put it. Obama is not a polarizing figure because he’s black. Before Colin Powell frittered away a fair amount of respect among the American people by supporting Obama, he was someone who some well-connected figures in the GOP had occasionally brought up in discussions about possible Presidential candidates. Hell, some conservatives considered to be “out there” by more mainstream conservative perspectives supported a bid by Alan Keyes for the Oval Office. The Rev. Jesse Jackson has run for the Democratic nomination more than once. It isn’t the color of skin that matters. A black president was a statistical inevitability.
No, Obama is a polarizing figure because he supports radical points of view, and has on several occasions shown a fair amount of contempt for some of the American people. From his support for Unions, or the philosophy that Americans don’t pay enough for gasoline, or the belief that the Constitution is a fundamentally flawed document, or his promises to destroy the coal industry, or his openly derisive remarks about the voters in Pennsylvania bitterly clinging to their guns and their religion, he is the anthesis of the “uniter” that he claimed he wanted to be.
I don’t need to be a racist to be critical of the President. And my curiosity about all the things we don’t know about him doesn’t have to be motivated by racism either. We used to know a whole lot more about the people who sought the office. It was part of the “getting to know you” dance that candidates used to have with the voters. Yet, in comparison to other candidates, we knew so little about this one. A young man with what appeared to be an unremarkable career, punctuated by leaps up the ladder of elective office, and a record that demonstrated little other than an unwaivering commitment to abortion. A man who a slobbering press made out to be “smarter than Spock” and “like a God”, and yet had no record to support it shy of his attendance at a prestigious law school and little else. A man who appeared articulate, as long as a machine told him what to say, and a blithering idiot when it wasn’t available. No, if there are questions that people still harbor about this President, the fault lies with him, and with the press, who decided that it was more important to sell his hope for change than it was to sell his resume and history. For him to chastise the American people for still caring about this instead of being “serious”, rather than actually working to gain their trust and their confidence reveals more about him and his character than I think he really wanted to.
It really isn’t us, Barry. Its you, and this ridiculous pose of entitlement that you adopt. It was offensive in the last election cycle, when you acted as if you really didn’t want us to know any more than what you wanted to tell us about you, and it has only gotten more grating in the years since. The good news is that now you have a record that you have to run on. The shibboleth of racism isn’t going to have the same degree of shutuppery that it carried in times past. And quit lecturing us about the seriousness of things. We don’t get to hop on Air Force One whenever we want to go on a friend’s television show before a grueling day pressing the flesh with campaign donors; we work for a living.

The “racism” charge is brought by two groups. The first are the Tavis Smiley’s of the world. Those whose careers are mostly supported by their association with racism as an issue. Jesse Jackson. Al Sharpton. Certain black politicians who are not bright enough for their positions, but have managed to parlay their color into a job (Maxine Waters comes to mind).
The second group who level the charge are those who are either indoctrinated to see everything through that prism, or too stupid to understand the complexities of the issue.
For anyone to say this:
It blows the mind. That is just mind numbingly asinine.
Doubting the President’s citizenship has nothing to do with “criticizing” him.
BiW wants to know more. What more? He presented the same biography as a candidate that every candidate before him did. His birthplace, his academic history, his (albeit short) legislative history. What more did you want? What about his biography is so hard to believe?
Birtherism has nothing to do with policy and everything to do with identity politics. Race is one obvious possibility but if it makes the medicine go down better BiW, let’s just say the identity politics of being “different”.
You forgot to call me a racist.
You know you want to. You know it’s killing you.
C’mon. Get it out. You’ll feel sooooooo much better.
—————————————————————–
What more did you want?
I’d like the Presstitutes to have given him the same sphincter spelunking that its given to every other candidate for the job before they paved the way for the first Affirmative Action President.
I’d like to see Andrew Sullivan rooting around in Michelle’s uterus to make sure that the children are really hers. I’d like to see the claims that Obama is a “quitter” for voluntarily giving up his license to practice law. I’d like to see the same psuedo-serious pieces authored by armchair psychologists who were concluding that McCain’s temper was a problem and that perhaps he was unsuited for the job. I want the articles evaluating Obama’s grades in college and his submissions to the Harvard Law Review, especially since a slobbering press corps (ask Obama, it really is pronounced that way) still maintains that he is the smartererest President ever, and I wanted the scrutiny of his wife’s business dealings, maybe an explaination of why it is she no longer has her law license. I’d like to see his contempt for much of America called what it is by a media that could apparently care less.
I’d like to see a reporter ask him what the hell he was thinking giving a shout out to someone before barely acknowleding a muslim attack on servicemen and women at Fort Hood. I wanted to see someone in the press corpse or Congress look him in the eye when he finally, albelit grumpily gave a presser on the Fruit of Kaboom bomber, and ask him why he was treating the American people as if it was such a crushing incovenience to do the damn job he asked us to give him with a modicum of respect for the people who were then expecting him to do it. And I’d like for anyone within earshot the next time he tries to distance himself from the disasterous policies he’s been embracing by whining and mewling about what he “inherited from his predecessor” by firmly reminding him that he asked us for the job, and that nothing that he is trying to blame Bush for was a secret or concealed from him at the time, so he can man up and own the job he campaigned for.
But saying any of this, even by another member of government, say a Supreme Court Justice, or a member of Congress, is always responded to the same way: It’s racist.
The racism claim is beneath you, R. We’ve sparred how many years now? You aren’t dumb, and yet you, and anyone else who wants to swing this claim like a sword or a shield shame yourselves, and those who really did risk their lives to see to it that you and any other black person in America could be accepted into the same places as anyone else. We are more than fifty years from the civil rights movement. The county I work in had a black executive. I have appeared before black judges. We routinely see black Congressmen, and Appeals Court and Supreme Court judges. Race only matters to the people who want to use it as an excuse for their own failures now, or the failures of those who they want to shield from well-deserved scrutiny.
It’s tired, It’s transparent. And it’s so 1968. The excuse was on its way out with Thurgood Marshall’s appointment to the Supreme Court. It was in tatters when a black woman who grew up poor OVERCAME every obsticle set before her and built a media empire that is conservatively worth millions. The banner is now a few shreds, faintly waving in the wind generated by the pointed fingers and breathless declarations of it. Reclaim your dignity and retire it, R.
Doubting the President’s citizenship has nothing to do with “criticizing” him.
Correct, douchebag. It has everything to do with the law (and believing him).
If I publish a personal history, and say I was born of two Americans in America, and someone asked me anyways to prove I was born here, I’d show my birth certificate.
But this guy publishes a personal history that says one of his parents wasn’t an American, that he didn’t live some of his early life here, that he was adopted by another non-citizen, and when someone asks to see some proof he was born here, he said no.
How often do you need to buy new kneepads?
He produced a valid legal birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. That he didn’t satisfy YOU, Dog, is not his problem, it’s yours.
I didn’t say this birth certificate didn’t satisfy me. Don’t put words in my mouth, especially since the ones coming out of yours are so often utter bullshit.
Until he did this, he was clearly flauntly the American public. He had been asked for this proof many times, in many ways. There was reasonable concern – he has made a point of his international credentials himself. So to deny providing this proof for close to 4 years was a true affront to the people who he supposedly leads. It shows his utter disdain for us “common folks” – and that is a trait which I will not forgive in my elected officals.
So I ask you again: how often do you need to buy new kneepads from praying at the altar of Obama?
Perhaps there is a reading comprehension issue here. What about valid birth certificate do you not understand? His valid legal birth certificate was posted on the Internet years ago. Hawaii standard issue.
So I ask again, why did that not satisfy you?
Do you also need proof that the Hawaiian Admission Act was a validly signed document? Now that we know Obama was born in Hawaii (well most sane folk already knew it), perhaps you’d like to take issue with whether Hawaii was REALLY a state at the time.
You know … any method available to deligitimize the President.
Obama’s supporters are adamant in their refusal to recognize the multitude of mistakes, poor decisions and arrogance that so far characterize his Presidency because they are so heavily invested in ensuring by any means that he appears successful. Therefore the race card is the only option that they can see to bolster their argument. I believe that it is no coincidence that this complete reversal of his treatment of the “birther” issue just happens to occur in conjunction with the kickoff of his reelection campaign.
I will work most diligently to try to prevent Obama from winning reelection, because I believe that his record while in office has proven him to be a clear and present danger to the safety and welfare of our nation, primarily due to his ruinous policies.
This is a man who has told so many lies that it is impossible to determine exactly what his actions might be if he continues in office.
BiW, Phew … I’m glad you got all that off your chest. Odd that you omitted the fact that the airways were clogged with controversy over Bill Ayers, Tony Resco and Reverend Wright. Oh yeah …. Obama got a free pass alright.
As I said over at my place, I don’t have any racial suspicions when it comes to legit criticisms. Everything you mentioned (or at least 90% .. the list was so damn long) falls in the realm of reasonable criticism. I’ve never called you racist for pointing those things out.
The birthers fall into an entirely different category, reaching for the most remote and unlikely hypothetical imaginable to toss the guy out of office.
I depend on intelligent, thoughtful analysts such as yourself to reject such lunacy wholesale. When you don’t, you fail.
Was this “birtherism” racism?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-3929112-502163.html
You still miss the point, Rutherford. Trust is a fundamental component of leadership, and someone who has been as secretive as he when there were things that could raise the question in the minds of some of the people he would lead, keeping wraps on it, and going to great lengths to do so does not inspire that trust. Especially when it would have been so easy to put this to bed early. This was something perpetuated by the President himself, either out of contempt for those who would dare question his bona fides, or as some sort of political calculation.
Either way, producing it when his re-election campaign is getting under way, and wagging his finger at those who wanted to see it and lecturing them about their lack of seriousness before boarding a plane for a day of campaign related activities is classic Obama. Misdirect and lecture.
And tools like Crazy Larry were only too happy to aid him in this. That egg looked pretty good on his face. The fact it was lobbed by Orly Taitz made it even better. Between him and Sgt. Schultz not getting the answer he wanted from the clerics when he asked about Jesus and Obamacare have made for some really great television. Never has “It seemed like a good idea at the time” been so damn funny and pathetic at the same time.
Your CBS news link is not an example of birtherism. Everyone acknowledges where McCain was born and a valid constitutional question arose. It didn’t get much press and was pretty preposterous on the face of it.
Even more preposterous (true birherism) is claiming someone was born where he was not born.
The false equivalencies show that you’re slipping.
Oh … and yes Crazy Larry did look pretty silly but not because of any cogent presentation by Ms. Taitz. On the contrary, he looked silly because he was yelling at a lunatic, whom he booked knowing she was a lunatic. He wasted five minutes of air time.
McCain had legitimate concerns eh? Then I look forward to your answering a few question I had, they’re listed at my place, but I’ll reprint for ease here:
Like the question of whether or not Obama was adopted by his step-father?
How, and if, has the apparent name change from Obama to Soetoro and back to Obama been documented?
Was he ever an Indonesian citizen, and if so, when did he become a U.S. citizen again?
Do these not hold some Constitutional value?
BiW, Phew … I’m glad you got all that off your chest. Odd that you omitted the fact that the airways were clogged with controversy over Bill Ayers, Tony Resco and Reverend Wright. Oh yeah …. Obama got a free pass alright.
You mean Obama’s denials of being close to the man who married he and his wife? The man preaching garbage and hatred while Obama sat in the pews in front of him for how many years?
Or maybe the airwave clogging denials that he knew Bombing Billy Ayers as anything other than “a guy who lived in his neighborhood”, despite intersections on boards and Ayers hosting a freaking fundraiser for St. Barry in his freaking home? Yeah. He barely knew he existed.
Or how it was accidentally reported that Obama got a sweatheart deal on his Chicago residence from someone who kept getting in trouble for corruption, and yet a complicit media failed to dig any deeper, and was happy to say “Move along. Nothing to see here.”
Those “controversies” “clogging” the airwaves?
You seem to confuse Obama’s reaction to the coverage with the existence of the coverage. Yes, all three issues were covered by the MSM. Whether Obama dealt with any of them in a straight forward way is quite another matter.
Yes, all three issues were covered by the MSM.
When did spin and not digging deeper qualify as being covered?
That’s like saying Pravda covered the events of the Cold War.
How deep do you have to dig after showing Rev Wright in an endless loop on TV everyday? Doesn’t “America’s chickens have come home to roost” kinda speak for itself … or was that not reported in the MSM?
Rutherford, don’t you ever get tired of being a fucking moronic shill for communism?
You wouldn’t even make a good pop up target at Benning.
And nobody here hates Obama cause he’s a fucking half n half. That doesn’t mean shit.
We hate him because he’s a no good, rotten, lying piece of dogshit who’s trying his best to wreck this nation.
Fuck him, and his white mama.
Well Dick, there are birthers and folks who tolerate birthers. Since I happen to believe you and most of the others who post here have an above average IQ, I assume you’re not birthers AND I assume you dislike Obama for policy reasons.
The problem is not condemning (or at least dismissing) the birthers. Some of you not only tolerate them but cheer them on ‘cos it satisfies your Obama-hate.
We ought to make a deal. You guys stop cheering on the birthers and I’ll stop cheering on the Sarah Palin conspiracy folks.
And every last piece of shit who voted for his no good ass.
The false equivalencies show that you’re slipping.
What false equivalency would that be? That McGrumpy had to prove that he was qualified to run for office?
BiW … McGrumpy did NOT have to prove where he was born. Everyone accepted his biography and moved on from there. If Obama had indeed been born in Kenya of an American mother, then I’d have no problem with us wrestling with the definition of “natural born citizen” to evaluate his fitness for office. The fact is and has always been he wasn’t born in Kenya and the primary reason his biography is questioned is identity politics.
You’ve got a great list of Obama-related gripes. Stick to them and dismiss the birther nonsense for what it is.
McGrumpy did NOT have to prove where he was born.
Bzzzzt! Wrong! Lie # 1. He did have to prove where he was born, and that that qualified him to run:
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202424594348&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1
His valid legal birth certificate was posted on the Internet
Bzzzzzt! Wrong again. Lie # 2. His team posted an image of a copy of a short form. That is not a “valid legal birth certificate”. (BTW, Rutherford, how do you “post” a hardcopy document to the internet? Does your computer have some new-fangled transporter that lets you examine the actual source item being shown?)
He presented the same biography as a candidate that every candidate before him did
Bzzzt! Wrong again. Lie # 3. We know, for example, George W Bush’s and Al Gore’s college transcripts. Where Obama’s?
Three lies in the comments to one post. Not bad.
When a police officer asks to see your driver’s license, do you show him your library card, your social security card, your AARP card, and then, when more officers show up to deal with your disrespectful, uncooperative ass, do you then show your driver’s license? When you had it with you all along, and could have defused the whole thing by showing it when asked?
“For him to chastise the American people for still caring about this instead of being “serious”, rather than actually working to gain their trust and their confidence reveals more about him and his character than I think he really wanted to.”
Bingo!
Good post.