While we dance around in a ring and suppose, the secret sits in the middle and knows.
-Robert Frost
In a week that was full of stories for those who could find them, perhaps the biggest was the airing of the tape of President Downgrade with his radical racist mentor and professor from Harvard, Derrick Bell. This was a coup not because it was more evidence of who the President is, but because it underscored the active participation of the Press in NOT reporting to the American people who he was at their time of choosing. But the bigger coup was in revealing this in a manner in which they didn’t even realize that the story being told was an indictment of THEM, not the radical divider currently putting his feet on the furniture at 1800 Pennsylvania Avenue.
And now that the narrative has shifted, and now that the Press tacitly admits the reason it wasn’t reported, the spin has begun. Now we are being told that Bell wasn’t such a bad guy. That he wasn’t really all that radical, and that he didn’t really have very much influence. But this of course epitomizes this administration, which has cloaked so very much in secrecy while claiming the highest level of transparency ever. The only truths of this administration of note are arrogance, failure, and excuses.
The arrogance started early. From the appointment of a tax cheat to the Secretary of the Treasury, to the expansion of czars with little or no Congressional oversight, to a willingness to diminish the Presidency by inserting himself into matters that had nothing to do with him (“I don’t have all the facts, but the police acted stupidly.”) to standing at the podium in foreign countries and offering apologies for America to people who did not deserve any such apology, to appointments without Congressional approval while Congress was still in session, and deigning to suggest to a prominent church leader that he himself did not understand his own churches doctrine, the President has revealed himself as possibly the most arrogant person we have ever had fill the position, which is quite an achievement considering the amount of failure and excuse that he has inflicted on us.
In the office where the buck once stopped with a more capable predecessor, he has offered up a startling amount of excuse and failure, along with empty bluster and bullying. Senator Obama was quick to blame his predecessor for a host of ills, whether it was high gas prices with a Democratic Congress, or a startlingly high unemployment rate that was significantly less than the percentage under his own term, even with his labor department fixing how the number was arrived at. Despite asking us for the job, and now asking for his contract to be renewed, no failure has been his fault. The power and majesty of the dumbest President EVER, George W. Bush has proven to be much stronger than the much-celebrated Obama mojo, as the evil BOOOOOOSH has managed to so screw things up, that no matter how much he can talk about finding someone’s “ass to kick”, and no matter what pressure he has no compunction about bringing from the bully pulpit he possesses, he simply can have no effect on things whatsoever. Every single thing plaguing this Administration, be it unemployment made worse by his own reckless and irresponsible spending, and increased regulations, a stagnant economy straining under oppressive regulations and intrusiveness, healthcare costs that continue to go up thanks to a planned takeover of the industry, and increased burdens imposed by the government, or sky-high gas prices that can be traced back to uncertainty from a foreign policy apparently determined to set the Middle East on fire, and domestic policies designed to all but shut down any domestic energy production on government land or in off shore drilling is the fault of his predecessor.
And now that a silly church that can trace its roots to the time of Christ won’t simply surrender its beliefs in favor of his doctrine, he finally has something to run on instead of his failure and our disappointment: the elevation of a government-granted entitlement to be provided by someone else to the status of a “right”, and the denial of it equated to a “War on Women”.
There are plenty of reasons to elect anyone else this November. And I’m afraid that right now, we’re so busy invoking our fallen and waiving that bloody shirt that we won’t be talking about these reasons every single day.
This was passive aggressive fraud as candidate who excoriated George Bush for creating $4.5 trillion dollars worth in debt in eight years, even going so far as to call it criminal, only to surpass Bush in three years with a supermajority Dimocratic Congress at his beckoning. His excuse? Oh, well the economy was actually much worse than we realized. Either way, Obama was and is grossly incompetent.
How about the Summer Recovery of 2010? Or closing GITMO, only to now build them a soccer field – at GITMO.
And to the fact that record includes almost 3MM net jobs lost in the process, with little or anything to show for it except a downgrade of our credit rating, and I think it fair to say chutzpah doesn’t begin to describe the man.
Anybody that votes for Obama now and honestly compares Obama’s promises of 2008 to Obama’s record of achievement and attempts to defend it, lies not only to us, but to himself.
And yet they will. This election, more then the last, will reveal the true power of stupidity and insanity.
I saw this as an answer today, when some lefty dunce was preening about ‘Game Change’ and how stupid Sarah Palin was.
Did she call Europe a “country?” Did she say Austrians speak “Austrian?” Did she say Hawaii is in Asia? Did she say that there are 57 states? Does she think we need more “Arabic translators” in Afghanistan so we can understand the natives? Does she believe we have an “intercontinental” railroad?
Does she think the Constitution was written “20 centuries ago?” Did she claim that Emma Lazarus raised funds to build the Statue of Liberty? Does she think Mexico was a nation before the US was even an idea? Did the American army liberate Auschwitz?
Does she celebrate “Cinco de Cuatro”, admire the Penn State “Nitally” Lions, and root for the White Sox (not a one of whom she can identify by name) while reminiscing about the good ol’ days at “Cominskey Field?” Does she commend navy “corpse-men” and give a shout-out to the many fallen heroes who are in her audience? Does she lament the 10,000 dead in a Kansas storm when the death toll is actually 12? Does she really think a payment can decrease by 3000%? If she has asthma, does she grab for her “breathalizer?”
Obama is brilliant, yes he is.
Blood Fluke: Parasitic trematode flatworm found primarily in Southeast Asia, North Africa, and other tropical areas. The blood fluke lives primarily in the tiny blood vessels of the intestines. People infected with blood flukes become weakened and can die either as a direct result of the blood fluke or because it renders them incapable of fighting against other endemic diseases.
Liver Fluke: Parasitic trematode flatworm that infects the livers of a variety of animals, including humans. Another name for a liver fluke infestation is “rot.” Liver fluke infestation causes abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness and, eventually, liver cirrhosis, with all that cirrhosis entails.
Lung Fluke: Parasitic trematode flatworm that infects human lungs. In the lungs, it causes causes chronic bronchitis and may result in coughing up blood. If it migrates to the spine, it can cause paralysis, and if it migrates to the heart or the brain, death results.
Sandra Fluke: Parasitic leftist agent that infects educational institutions and the body politic. Operates by demanding large financial subsidies for personal behaviors that provide no return benefit to the educational institutions or the state. Organisms that sustain serious infections by these leftist parasites routinely suffer complete system failures, evidenced by political bankruptcy, rioting in the streets, and potential societal collapse.
I can’t take credit.
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/10/the-democrats-birth-control-games-add-another-parasite-to-the-lexicon/#comment-321988
Like an informercial “But wait there’s still more…”
The Administration will be looking to restore UNESCO funding in 2013.
I finally saw the story on the topic so I went and got a copy of the budget summary from State. You need to look there because it isn’t to be found in the actual Presidential budget.
Anyway the UNESCO thing is there and so isn’t a ton of spending that the US has been doing for some time in support of various international bureaucracies. It is maddening.
Y’All want to see something really funny? You may have to click to enlarge.
This is too good, if you look at the detail. Now tell me this isn’t the truth.
http://disruptthenarrative.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/romanempire1.jpg
That made me crack a great big grin.
It’s kind of a shame that as I’ve read your work over the past couple of years it has degraded from real quality to over the top emotional lectures. You’re turning into Tex Taylor with better writing skills and the willingness to do a little research … and that is no compliment.
The video, as you well know, is much ado about nothing. There is no evidence Bell was Obama’s “mentor”. Furthermore, Bell’s work was highly esoteric stuff relating to the intersection of racism and the judicial. In a country where the law of the land was that blacks were 3/5ths of a person, there is no denying that our legal system legitimized racism. Bell was not the first nor will he be the last to suggest that blacks are better off fending for themselves and not relying on whites for assistance.
The only thing we can discern from the video was that Obama supported Bell’s issue that Harvard needed to tenure women. Bell was the first tenured black professor at Harvard. Rather than resting on this achievement he fought for others to receive their due, even to the point of taking an unpaid leave in protest. Years earlier when the Justice Department told him he could work for them or belong to the NAACP but not both, he told them to stuff it and kept his NAACP membership. He clearly was a man of principle. I’m not claiming he was a saint. I’m not claiming Critical Race Theory doesn’t have its problems. I am claiming this is a pumped up bit of nothingness because, for reasons that completely elude me, the GOP refuses to simply attack Obama on his record.
There is no reason to unearth this garbage. For an incumbent President so clearly vulnerable on domestic issues, it is mind boggling that the GOP goes for “the radical” and the “attack on religion” and the “snobbery of college education”.
Your team is going to lose this election through sheer stupidity and with your opening paragraph you are aiding and abetting them.
P.S. Last time I looked, the President resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
In a country where the law of the land was that blacks were 3/5ths of a person, there is no denying that our legal system legitimized racism.
Rutherford, you ignorant slut, as it has been explained to you many, many times, the 3/5 compromise was a way to achieve in time what was not possible at the time the Constitution was negotiated: an end to slavery.
By ensuring an inevitable demographic shift away from power for slave states, the comrpomise ensured that the south was going to outnumbered both in total numbers, and in Congressional representation, which meant that the institution of slavery would not survive.
The video, as you well know, is much ado about nothing. There is no evidence Bell was Obama’s “mentor”.
Of course not. No more than we can believe he sat his ass in The Wrong Reverend Wright’s church for 20 years, and never really paid attention to any of the hatred for America and “whitey” that spilled out from that pulpit week in and week out, or that Bill Ayers was “just a guy from his neighborhood”. Hell, I’m sure he and Bell hardly knew each other. I can’t count the times that Barry has introduced someone he didn’t really know and have an affinity with by extemporaneous remarks and a warm hug.
Furthermore, Bell’s work was highly esoteric stuff relating to the intersection of racism and the judicial.
Bell’s work was delusional, with a strong dose of paranoia, and a completely open contempt for the system that as a lawyer, he was supposed to defend.
And again, you miss the point. We already know that Obama had radical associations. Hell, he was even polite enough to tell us in his book. The point is that we had a legacy media so eager to annoint him that they never even bothered to tell the American people about him (His grades? His law review article? Hel-looooo?) or the people who obviously made an impression upon him and his thinking. It wasn’t about the story we were never told; it was about the people who abdicated their duty to tell us, Rutherford.
I am claiming this is a pumped up bit of nothingness because, for reasons that completely elude me, the GOP refuses to simply attack Obama on his record.
It isn’t nothingness; its an indictment of the Press who now consider it their duty to decide for us what is an is not an important detail, rather than reporting and letting us decide. However, we are in agreement that the GOP should be bringing up his stunning record of incompetence and failure every single time they step in front of a microphone, and yet seem unwilling to do so.
For an incumbent President so clearly vulnerable on domestic issues, it is mind boggling that the GOP goes for “the radical”
Except that it shows that he isn’t a “moderate” or a “uniter”, since as already pointed out, this is something that is not pointed out among the alphabet soup media.
and the “attack on religion”
I wish they really would attack this. Not only would it damage his ability to use that time-tested Democratic campaigning from the pulpit, but it might further damage the secularists’ denial of history and hamfisted attempts to re-write it.
and the “snobbery of college education”.
Santorum really has made a hash of this. If I find the time, I could write something discussing the issues implicated in this cultural mirage, but if I had to put it in a short and simple summary, “higher education” is yet another thing that Democrats want to wring of value with the idea that it should be an entitlement for everyone, that it will equip the student for financial success, and that it should be paid for by society (i.e. the taxpayers), much like the independence that government fostered with its “War on Poverty”.
P.S. Last time I looked, the President resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
The same as the mere mortals who previously held the same post? There is NOTHING “historic” or “unprecedented” about that.
First, not to blog pimp, but I wrote on this subject last week. You’re welcome to critique it.
Second, I think you missed my reference to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. It was a correction of your “1800 Pennsylvania Avenue”.
Third, I’m in awe of the nobility of declaring a black man 3/5ths of a man as a compromise. Truth be told, the founding fathers failed us on day 1. Slavery should have been abolished from the get-go. Their cowardice in allowing the evil institution to persist cost us much blood and treasure some 70 years later and haunts us to this day.
Fourth, your insistence that Obama is some sort of radical shows delusion beyond comprehension. One reason the man is vulnerable in November is that he lost the support of true progressives. Obama is practical, political and a wee bit opportunistic. He may not be a uniter but he’s not this raging radical you have constructed in your paranoid imagination.
Finally regarding the press and their responsibility to unearth this “disturbing video” back in 2008, let me ask you a question as a newspaper editor. Your staff comes to you with two headlines. “Obama praises author of obscure racist legal theory” or “Obama attends church with pastor who says “Goddam America” accompanied by video of said sermon”. Which headline do you run with BiW?
In 2008, Rev Wright was a household name. We really needed Bell too?
Second, I think you missed my reference to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. It was a correction of your “1800 Pennsylvania Avenue”.
I have to hand it to you.
Most people would be alarmed at things whistling over their heads the way my response did, but not you.
Third, I’m in awe of the nobility of declaring a black man 3/5ths of a man as a compromise. Truth be told, the founding fathers failed us on day 1. Slavery should have been abolished from the get-go. Their cowardice in allowing the evil institution to persist cost us much blood and treasure some 70 years later and haunts us to this day.
I’m in awe how you can focus so intently on one detail, without bothering to educate yourself beyond the thing you “know” that just isn’t true. This has come up before, and it has all but been explained to you with pictures drawn in crayon. You no longer have an excuse to be ignorant on this issue, and I’m not really inclined to teach to you again what every educator that has ever instructed you failed to have you learn.
Fourth, your insistence that Obama is some sort of radical shows delusion beyond comprehension. One reason the man is vulnerable in November is that he lost the support of true progressives. Obama is practical, political and a wee bit opportunistic. He may not be a uniter but he’s not this raging radical you have constructed in your paranoid imagination.
Oh, no. Not radical in the slightest. Whether its attacking those bitter clingers, or Oplogizing for America in countries near and far, to insulting our allies and cozying up to dictators and thugs, and condemning polic for acting stupidly when he doesn’t have all the details, refusing to call Major Hasan what he is, and having more visits from Andy Stern than the SEIU rank and file had from him…no, no radicalism at all.
I hope your wife lays your clothes out for you in the morning, because you’re too blind to be dressing yourself without assistance.
Finally regarding the press and their responsibility to unearth this “disturbing video” back in 2008, let me ask you a question as a newspaper editor. Your staff comes to you with two headlines. “Obama praises author of obscure racist legal theory” or “Obama attends church with pastor who says “Goddam America” accompanied by video of said sermon”. Which headline do you run with BiW?
In 2008, Rev Wright was a household name. We really needed Bell too?
In a climate where we knew every grade Bush got, and there was all sort of hand wringing about his time in “Skull and bones” and the National Guard, or we know about Gingrich’s credit accounts and the supposed skinny on all of his wives, or are subjected to the excruciating details of Palin’s last child brith, but we are going to downplay the radical associations that are reported, with almost no questions and no follow up made of the President himself, and the deliberate NON reporting of other stories? Seriously? That’s quite a position for someone like you to take, R. Who knew you could play “Twister” so well?
In 2008 Wright and Bill Ayers became household names. In fact, you need serious re-education. It was during the primary season that Obama’s background was on constant display. How many Americans had heard of Bill Ayers before Hillary’s folks brought it up? Who ever heard of Tony Rezko were it not for the primary battle.
Some of your anger about Obama not being properly vetted should be directed at John McCain who (to his credit) wanted to avoid what he considered personal attacks. Of course, vetting was not McCain’s staff’s forte anyway considering the Palin pick.
And in the ONE question Obama was asked on Ayers, the response was “He was just a guy in my neighborhood”.
No follow up. No questions asked of HIM about the Anenberg Foundation, no questions asked of him about fund raising campaigns kicked off in the Ayers’ home. And no serious follow up questions asked of him about Wright. It was like like “These aren’t the droids you’re looking for”, except that Obama didn’t need to do a Jedi mind trick, because his answers were the ones that the press was looking for.
Believe it or not, it isn’t the opposing candidate’s job to vet him. That’s why we have a supposely neutral and objective press. But since they were too busy humping his leg, like Chrissy Tingles Mathews, or fawning over his “God-like” bearing like Evan Thomas, or marveling about his much vaunted [and conspicuously absent] intellect with their “Smart Like Spock” inanity, that simply was not going to happen. They abdicated and became another organ of the campaign in 2008, and they and the public need to be reminded of it at every single opportunity.
If there was no “follow up” why on Earth did Obama have to make a speech about his relationship with Wright and about race relations in general? By the way, it was considered one of his best speeches.
I can’t argue with you about Ayers. The primary person to push that story was Sarah Palin (“palling around with terrorists”). The MSM didn’t do much with it. But as far as Wright was concerned, that got wall to wall coverage.
Uh oh…They got fact on your meme again, R.
In 2008 Wright and Bill Ayers became household names.
Only among political junkies – the media did a crappy job of reporting about them and their impact on Obama to the general public.
Keep writing this “stuff” BIC. I will try to help you with my “unresearched” opinion and poor writing skills, as we do our small part to properly vet the ACORN organizer and community activist this time.
As usual, Rutherford not only missed the context displayed his pedantic critique, but provides a good measuring stick to the effectiveness of the narrative that supposedly “fell flat.” For something so ineffective and rehashed, this Derrick Bell story sure does piss the Rutherford types of the world off when it’s mentioned, this time for the entire world to see. It is one but a series of tapes to be released, if I understood correctly.
Besides, anybody that writes something like this…
…is himself somewhat radicalized himself, and either a liar, a dupe or a fool; or like I believe, all three.
To talk to someone of Rutherford’s ilk, you would have to believe militancy like SDS and theories like critical race are not progressive enough. It’s not much different than marketing “jobs saved” or “success of the stimulus” or Obama being responsible for the surge in the stock market.
What I have discovered the last four years, is liberalism is in large part a manipulation construct that spends a considerable amount of time and resources to fool those that can be fooled. Rush Limbaugh, though I love him and believe him a real talent, walked right into a trap when he called Sandra Fluke a slut. Limbaugh missed an opportunity to point out Fluke a caricature of the entitled contraceptive sponge and abortion on demand proponent – a zealot and political activist seeking to do damage to a Catholic University. Rush allowed the debate to be framed from freedom of conscience, infringement of basic rights and a hatred of organized religion, to one of women’s health – a debate we had won and could have used to prove just how really “radical” Obama and his cabinet truly are.
However, this last week should teach us a good lesson.
We’ve got to learn to be to as shrewd as serpents when dealing with snakes. And Obama is certainly the head of the snake. Cut off the head, and the rest immediately becomes moot.
There is clear evidence that Bell carried sway with Obama from the video.
“Open up your hearts and your minds and listen to….” ring a bell?
Now if Obama found no validity in what Bell “preached”, why would he have asked those in attendance to open up their hearts and their minds?
“Open your hearts and minds” to the cause of faculty diversity at Harvard, not Critical Race Theory. The video needs to be put in context. The protest Obama was attending had to do with giving tenure to a female Harvard prof, and Bell was integral to the protest because he was taking an unpaid leave to denounce Harvard’s lack of faculty diversity.
I know it strains your brain cells, Tex, to believe that one man can actually care about more than one cause at one time. Bell wasn’t CRT 24/7. He had other causes and interests and Obama supported him in one of those, faculty diversity.
Don’t buy it, because diversity is code word for racism, as critical race theory is a ruse for organized racism. But we can argue back and forth.
My brain cells don’t strain. They synapse. Perhaps that helps to explain your ever present disconnect, and your IBS – the straining.
Only in your bizarro world. Diversity is about putting in check processes that exclude qualified minorities.
Diversity is about putting in check processes that exclude qualified minorities.
*cough* BULLSHIT *cough* *cough*
Ms. Grutter and Mr. Bakke are outside. They’d like a word with you about “qualificiations”.
Seriously, if test scores don’t establish qualification, then why do schools ask for them?
I recall arguing with My Con Law II prof, Brent Simmons (who happens to be black) about Bakke when we read the case. It was interesting because he was working on an Amicus Brief for the Grutter case at the time.
When I asked him if it made sense to “lower the bar” for entrance of a specific minority (phrased that way because only black students seemed to have a need for the standard in Bakke to be lowered for them…other minorities tracked in the U of California’s Med school applications didn’t seem to have any trouble meeting the entrance qualifications) he didn’t deny that the school’s policy admitted those who were less qualified than other applicants, including other minorities. Instead, he pontificated on how this was a just “remediation” for past injustices, and allowed them an opportunity that was previously denied them. I opined that some remediation might be in order, but questioned whether or not graduate school was the place to engage in it. I then elaborated by saying I’d have no issue with a minority physician (hell, I’ve had one at every stage of my life) but offere dthe thought that most people would not be enthusiastic to know that their doc only got into med school because someone thought it was just to lower the entrance standards for them. When I went on to suggest that it doesn’t do good things for society when someone qualified is pushed aside for someone less qualified because we are trying to achieve some sort of remediation of past sins, we all lose because we are not gettting the best and brightest, and we discourage some of those who are.
But then, if they were qualified, then we wouldn’t need such standards in the first place, and Justice O’Connor would not have had to end her decision in
Grutter
with the following lines:You know, old friend. Let us talk honestly now that we have parted company. You say you prefer honesty. Let’s be honest.
I am grateful to Obama for two things. The first is giving the consent to blast Anwar al-Awlaki to hell, American citizen or not. That is one thing I refuse to criticize The One about, unlike most Republicans. We should all be grateful. Bin Laden? Any sitting President would have given the order or else been fried on the public square.
The second one was unintended, but has finally happened. Finally, because of the blatant double standards of accepted behavior, the fatuous charges of racism being thrown in my generation’s face for 40 years, the insidious nature of diversity and multiculturalism no longer taboo in discussion thanks to Obama and company, and the way blacks have acted over the last three years while now having “real power” (your definition, not mine), finally we can have a real conversation about what ails black America – and it ain’t whitey.
One other thing before proceeding. Do you remember when I told you long ago that I wasn’t worried about Obama succeeding, but failing? What do you really think is going to happen if Obama just happens to get beaten in a close vote this fall? Want to bet we experience racial tension not seen since say Watts, charges of cheating, etc…and that the chaos precipitated by blacks, egged on by the liberal elitist albinos that use blacks like chattel?
So much for the post-racial President.
——-
It always better to let the legal scholar rip you to shreds about definition, but from the mathematical, scientific, and economic standpoint, diversity has lowered the bar. As share the wealth actual lowers the median wealth, share the curriculum has lowered academic standards.
You want to talk about qualifications? Sorry, but there wouldn’t have been a minority one in my medical school program when Asians are excluded, unless a bridge program had been provided to accept sub par MCAT scores.
One question from a white man to a black man. Why is that I have no problem admitting the the black race more anaerobically gifted than whites, but you can’t admit the white race superior academically to blacks? We’ve had going on three generations now a concerted effort to “even the score”, spent billions doing so, and the gap in scholastic scores after a small minority uptick, is actually increasing now, not decreasing as promised.
Should we compare say Europe vis-a-vis Africa civilization of yesteryear to remove the stain of racism to make comparison of worldly achievement and accomplishment? Perhaps it is time now that blacks drop the charges of hate, and perhaps give a vote of thanks that while your ancestors certainly suffered unfairly, you haven’t.
Have no fear, “R”. I’m not discounting you, as you an intelligent but not wise. I am simply demonstrating the big pink elephant in the room that you choose to ignore.
One question from a white man to a black man. Why is that I have no problem admitting the the black race more anaerobically gifted than whites, but you can’t admit the white race superior academically to blacks?
I’m not willing to conceed this, as I’ve known numerous examples very anerobically gifted whites and some truly academically superior blacks. That said, I DO think that the results you see reflect the priorites and traits that are admired and aimed for in each “community”
We’ve had going on three generations now a concerted effort to “even the score”, spent billions doing so, and the gap in scholastic scores after a small minority uptick, is actually increasing now, not decreasing as promised.
While I haven’t seen any hard data that backs this up, if “diversity” is a criteria to balance out lower academic achievement, then it is a pretty devastating indictment of this massive effort and intervention.
But hey, at least the teachers got to make a good living from it, so its all good, right?
Of course BIC, there are always exceptions to the rule 2-3 standard deviations from the norm. I recently met a black neurosurgeon, who I am sure is brilliant. But he stood in a crowd of 18 other white and Asian neurosurgeons while speaking.
One of my best acquaintances was a young, light skinned black gal, who though she couldn’t qualify on the MCAT, actually turned out to be one of the better students.
And there are some anaerobically gifted white athletes, especially in the power events such as weightlifting. However, let us take the most basic of all athletic skills – locomotion. How many white or Asian athletes did you see in the 32 men who qualified and ran the 100 meter dash in the 2008 Olympics? There is one “white guy” who actually has won the world championships named Jeremy Wariner, but even that has drawn a great deal of attention because it is so rare.
Ironically, in the ultimate all around competition of total Olympic athletic skill sets (the Decathlon) as a general rule, whites have dominated the event.
Here is some recent hard data confirming the widening test gap.
http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
By the way, Jeremy Wariner won the 400 meter event for clarification.
Speaking of being busted, this should give you BIC and El Tigre some much needed humor – and the definition of being busted for lying.
Hopefully, you haven’t seen this already.
Watch the video of the woman’s patronizing, and then read what they have found.
The thought thickens. At the very least, Obama has certainly kept company with some really awful people his entire life. Another Obama acolyte.
http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2012/03/12/derrick-bells-love-for-new-black-panther-party-founder-and-white-house-counsel/
I’m sorry. I just noticed that I didn’t provide the link of Soledad’s guest getting her ass handed to her – and until tonight, she didn’t even know it.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/12/soledad-obrien-is-right-and-everybody-needs-to-shut-up-about-it-says-soledad-obrien/
Tex, I pointed out the initial VD at R’s place. Soledad got her ass handed to her big time. Guess who denied it based on the other black guest that said CRT was just casual discussion among faculty so there’s nothing to it?
I Soledad tried to educate herself on the subject. . . in the usual mainstream media way. . .
I must have been drunk last night, without drink. Make that “the plot thickens.”
Good grief, perhaps Rutherford is right. I am losing it. I blame it on Michelle Obama fatigue. One more look at her muttly face, and I might have an aneurysm.
Remember when Rush called The Parasite a slut, and libs were outraged?
What do you do with an MSNBC “analyst” that uses ‘Homos,’ ‘Chinamen,’ and ‘Crackers’ in normal conversation?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/03/13/Al%20Sharpton%20Slut-Gate
We built pyramids before Socrates, those Greek Homos….
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/13/NBC-News-Sharptons-Racist-Homophobic-Rants-Sexist
Tex, the Sharpton link is too good not to share. I will place it on Rutherford’s site since he was only recently lecturing me about Mr. Sharpton’s impressive change of heart before joining MSNBC.