…is that to be correct, it should be done into a mirror.
Accomplished bully, and, oddly enough, paid spokesperson for the anti-bullying movement, Dan “Attack Dog” Savage , is just the latest example.
Savage, “famous” for a sex column and grabbing headlines for such brave and unbully-like acts such as naming gay-sex effluvia after Senator Rick Santorum, and statements about how much he wants to F**k Santorum, and how he wants all Republicans dead recently gave a Sheridan apology for his bullying of high school students at a recent conference in which he launched into a tirade on the Bible, and then call the students who chose to remove themselves from his 15 minutes of hate by calling them “pansies” as they departed from his expertly rendered discussion against bullying.
Now, for those who like some justification with their assertions, you’ll note that he cites little to support his claims of the Bible containing “bullshit”. The Bible supports slavery, and was used to justify slavery? Tell it to the abolitionists who were waiving it with equal committment, Mr. Savage. Christians eat shellfish, and therefore are hypocrites, Mr. Savage? Tell it to Jesus, who said
14 When He had called all the multitude to Himself, He said to them, “Hear Me, everyone, and understand: 15 There is nothing that enters a man from outside which can defile him; but the things which come out of him, those are the things that defile a man. 16 If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear!”17 When He had entered a house away from the crowd, His disciples asked Him concerning the parable. 18 So He said to them, “Are you thus without understanding also? Do you not perceive that whatever enters a man from outside cannot defile him, 19 because it does not enter his heart but his stomach, and is eliminated, thus purifying all foods?”
Mark 7:14-19
There are also 6 other New Testament references that make it clear to anyone capable of reading and understanding, that this would be one of those taboos that isn’t taboo to a Christian, meaning, of course, that Mr. Savage was not correct when he decided to belittle the beliefs of a captive audience who did not have the opportunity to respond…much like bullies often do.
Missing the opportunity for demonstrating any real understanding, he recently apologized on his website, displaying the same tact and wisdom that has so recently put him back in the spotlight in an uncomfortable way:
I didn’t call anyone’s religion bullshit. I did say that there is bullshit—”untrue words or ideas”—in the Bible. That is being spun as an attack on Christianity. Which is bullshhh… which is untrue. I was not attacking the faith in which I was raised. I was attacking the argument that gay people must be discriminated against—and anti-bullying programs that address anti-gay bullying should be blocked (or exceptions should be made for bullying “motivated by faith”)—because it says right there in the Bible that being gay is wrong. Yet the same people who make that claim choose to ignore what the Bible has to say about a great deal else. I did not attack Christianity. I attacked hypocrisy. My remarks can only be read as an attack on all Christians if you believe that all Christians are hypocrites. Which I don’t believe.
No, Dan. When you attack the basis for someone else’s beliefs, you are attacking those beliefs, and the difference between those whom you mocked when they shook the dust off their heels and departed, and you, is that they have read and understood that which clearly eludes you. But then, with a plank in your eye that is the size of a redwood, I’m surprised that you can drive a car without running into anything. But then, since people still hire you to talk about fighting back against bullying, my surprise is tempered with resigned disappointment.
You can’t expect someone that vicious to concede the objective nature of his viciousness. Remember that he’s morally superior to those who disagree with him. That’s his license to say anything at all he thinks will get him what he wants.
To me, it was a great example of today’s multi cultural based political correctness. Then, he tried to cover his butt, and as always? It just didn’t work. Historical revisionism is often used as a tool by people like him and as often as not they are not only proven to be incorrect, but extremely so. A sort of hammer meet nail. Followed by hammer meet thumb.
Fran,
I wouldn’t expect the bully to acknowledge that he is a bully, especially when he is an expert on why bullying is bad. The point was to make it clear that not everyone is intimidated, especially by loudmouth know-it-all’s who clearly do not know what they claim to know. Remember, no one laughed at the naked emperor until someone was clearly more amused by the nudity and pose than they were afraid of what might happen to them.
For all his bluster, I don’t see him being anywhere near as brave with followers of the “Religion of Peace”, who don’t just say things he wouldn’t like about homosexuality…they’d kill him. And picking the easy target is the hallmark of a bully.
This was a good one BiW. I know the Bible part hits you but for me Savage lost his case the minute he, a gay man, had the gall to call someone else a pansy. Could a less appropriate person possibly be chosen to speak out against bullying?
You got this one right.
Excellent, sir!
If the organizers of the high school journalism conference did not want this type of retort then they shouldn’t have picked Dan Savage.It would be like expecting George Carlin not to have a “potty” mouth.
Raji makes an excellent point. What possessed them to book Savage in the first place?
Probably because of his role (along with his significant other) in starting the “It Gets Better” dealeo, for which he was recognized and acclaimed by Hillary Clinton and this Administration.
I think that based on that, they thought they would get a decent speaker on the topic and not a bully.
😆
If I’m not mistaken, Sodomite Savage is the one who brought to America’s attention the word Teabagger. Really a lovely sort of fellow to introduce to the children.
You know the bluff that’s never called BIC? Where does the Bible condone slavery? Christians simply followed Christ’s message in working to condemn it not through verse but by works – abolitionists being one you mentioned. And the slaves of Israel weren’t the “slaves” of American Civil War anyway.
I’m still waiting for Sodomite Savage to show me where the Bible got that wrong as he claims.
Here’s the best part about the Sodomite Savage’s idiocy. All of those historically tolerant meccas of homosexuality on display? Not only are they gone and destroyed, most were about 75% slave. Seriously. Athens, Rome, did I mention Sodom? 😀
Nice post.
If I’m not mistaken, Sodomite Savage is the one who brought to America’s attention the word Teabagger. Really a lovely sort of fellow to introduce to the children.
I wasn’t aware of this…but then, I’m not really a fan, either. I just did a quick search, and I see that Soledad O’Brien’s favorite research tool, Wikipedia, seems to credit him with the term.
I just remember Anderson Cooper cracking himself up when reporting on its application to Tea Party members.
Or it could have been that Anderson was just reminiscing about the night before. 😈 I think just guessing by the looks of it, Anderson would more be referred to as teabaggee.
I had heard it was Dan Savage, but apparently it was well known term through the gay circles, of which I will admit, I had never heard until CNN and MSNBC brought to our attention. Who knows…
We’re in need of a post here. 😆
Tigre, I have several good ideas…and none of the ambition required to sit down and type them out. Commenting on Facebook seems to be taking it out of me.
That means I’m stuck with Rutherford’s inanity for the time being?
Hey Tigre ….. say it along with me ….
Suck
on
it.
🙂
Well, I won’t be able to write one today…but
If you want, YOU can write one, and I’ll let you guest post, or
You can come up with an alias, and get on FB, where I can get you invited into some of the very secret and private folds where you will find some really smart conservatives.
I almost wrote about Meggie Mac’s Tweet last night disparaging the South because of the Amendment 1 vote in North Carolina.
I’m sure that Billy Graham was distressed to no end because she didn’t approve of how he voted on it.
Whoa! That sounds like more effort than I’m willing to give.
Understand, it’s mot that I lack initiative. It’s just that I choose not to act on it. . .
“Secret and private folds” …. sounds a bit like JournoList. Better make sure none of that stuff leaks out! 😯
[…] people on all sides of this issue seem to be stepping up the rancor and rhetoric. Whether it is Expert Bully Dan Savage’s appeals for tolerance disguised as anti-Christian rants against school kids who dare to believe what […]